|
|
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Endodontic Microsurgery (Apicoectomy) in Houston, TX |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Services provided: Wisdom Teeth Extraction, Orthognathic Surgery, Dental Implants, Facial Trauma, Piney Point Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Drs. Weil and Koo are serving the greater Houston TX area including but not limited to: Stafford, Meyerland, Bellaire, Lamar Terrace, |
||||||||
The diagram at right illustrates a completed root canal. Gutta Percha has been used to seal the canal. Root canals can fail for any number of reasons by far the most common is failure of the seal at the tip of the root. One might ask, does this indicate a mistake on the part of the treating doctor? Not usually. We tend to think of the canal system of the tooth roots as discreet, round, simplistic systems. However, in reality the canal system is usually somewhat flattened in profile and may contain branches or extra canals which are not visible nor accessible with traditional techniques. Because of this, it may be impossible for anyone to successfully treat that particular tooth with the traditional root canal techniques. The diagram at right also shows the result of failure of the root canal. Namely, the presence of leakage and subsequent infection at the apex or tip of the root. This is a problem that will not resolve or go away without some intervention. Oral antibiotics is never a satisfactory long term solution either, because the source of infection has not been removed.
A second option would be to retreat the tooth with the traditional technique. While this is not at all unreasonable there are often some mitigating circumstances. Often the tooth has been restored with a crown. Retreatment necessitates mutilating that restoration by drilling a large hole into the top of the tooth. An additional issue is more of a philosophical one. Most root canals fail, not because of poor treatment, but because of anatomic peculiarities about that particular canal system that make treatment with the traditional techniques difficult or impossible. Those peculiarities still are present, however, and because of this retreatment often has a relatively low success rate. The third option is apical surgery (apicoectomy). This involves accessing the tip of the root directly and removing the diseased tissue, the preparing and filling the root tip itself. By making an incision in the gum tissue overlying the tooth, your surgeon then accesses the tip of the root. The root tip is then cut off and a small preparation or filling is made in the root tip itself and filled with a sealer to prevent further leakage of material out of the tooth. The illustration at right diagrams a completed apicoectomy with the root end filling in place. After a brief healing period, the gum tissue returns to normal. Eventually, after several months, the cavity in the bone surrounding the tooth will fill in with new bone completing the healing process. One may ask, how successful is this technique? The overall success is 80-85% when measured at ten years of time. A ten year success will most likely continue to hold up for the life of the tooth. This is all the more remarkable when one considers that the procedure is typically performed on a failing teeth to begin with. The downside of apicoectomy is primarily that it requires a surgical procedure to be performed and therefore is a brief postoperative recovery period to negotiate. The surgery itself is performed in our office operating suite with either local anesthesia, iv sedation, or general anesthesia. While many patients prefer to have only a local anesthetic (the administration of numbing medicine to the area being worked on) more often patients choose to be asleep or sedated. That is a decision best left up to the doctor and patient and can be explored more fully during your consultation visit.
